NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Review & Benchmarks

By
Updated: November 7, 2013
JH6A9357

Final Thoughts & Conclusion 

There are a few very important factors to consider when talking about a head to head battle between the GTX 780 Ti and the R9 290X and those things are heat and noise levels. As you can see the R9 290X is running very hot and regardless of what Kool-Aid you are drinking a card running over 95C is running very hot. AMD would have you believe that this is just things as normal and its all good, but in truth heat has always been the enemy of graphics cards since their onset and AMD claiming that cards running that hot are just another day are just trying to fool you. The AMD R9 runs hot and it runs loud and there is no avoiding that, and that to me is the biggest separation between the two cards. Ran at its default speeds the GTX 780 Ti saw maximum temperatures in the 82C range, while the 290X ran at 94C, which in temperatures is a very wide margin.

Performance wise the GTX 780Ti beats the R9 290X, but c’mon folks we all knew that was coming and the thing is the 780Ti does not smoke the 290X; in fact it just beats the 290X by a small margin, which is all it essentially needed to do. It seems like NVIDIA just enjoys the game of cards as much as we like gaming as they are now just trying to beat AMD enough to say, hey we did it, but not smash them under Thor’s hammer. This works in AMD’s favor as well as NVIDIA’s as if NVIDIA were to lose AMD as a competitor then NVIDIA would be split up into smaller companies and forced to compete from within their own walls as no monopolies are allowed in the USA. For us this is good news as well as it means that card pricing will be very competitive as well, also a good thing for the holiday season. Hopefully we will see more price drops on some of our favorite cards from both camps, which would be a nice gift to many would be buyers on a budget.

JH6A9337

You can see from all the tests results that when the AMD card is run in “UBER” mode it can almost keep up with the 780 Ti neck and neck and that is why we tested the gaming performance of the R9 290X only in that mode as quiet mode is for sissy boys and girls…I’m only kidding, but no real gamer is running his/her games in quiet mode. The thermal designs seen on the AMD R9 290X are like NVIDIA earlier GTX 480 that also ran like a lawnmower and just shows AMD having growing problems like NVIDIA did earlier on, but like NVIDIA, AMD will fix this and then they will have a more viable videos solution all around. NVIDIA is just further ahead on the curve right now and that gives them a small advantage in the thermal design area, and just like Intel also beats AMD at thermal design in the CPU game. AMD is always the underdog and there is nothing wrong with that as everyone cheers the underdog, as they are the great hope that keeps NVIDIA in check. Plus this competition drives the price war that only benefits the end-user at the end of the day when prices are dropped to keep us buying. For some people price is the beginning and ending of the buying conversation and for that group of users AMD has something to offer them, but for those who care solely about performance, price means little to nothing. Which group are you in? Or are you somewhere in-between and not biased by any sole factor and taking the whole picture in before making a decision? I fell the latter group will be pleased by what they see and read here today and not get mixed up in fanboy mentalities that at the end of the day are just feelings, not facts.

JH6A9325

The NVIDIA GTX 780 Ti can do walking what the AMD R9 290X has to run to keep up with as seen by the thermal and noise differences between the two cards when ran at comparable performance levels. NVIDIA’s GTX 780 Ti is a card that can be put into any system and get a standard of performance that cannot be matched by AMD’s R9 290X as the 290X runs too hot to be used in many of the small form factor systems, as without proper airflow the 290X would simply overheat. There is price differences however of $150.00 that lies in AMD’s favor as the R9 290X costs $549.99 and the NVIDIA GTX 780Ti costs $699.99. So if cost is the major factor in your personal buying decision then AMD wins that point by a hundred dollar margin there is no disputing that. G-SYNC technology will also be a very good thing when its implementation is a simple upgrade to your monitor as for now it’s still in its infancy and will need time to grow. Right now only a select few partners will be selling them and that means buying an entirely new monitor, something many gamers simply cannot afford to do no matter how much they like it. At the end of the test day it is clear that the new NVIDIA GTX 780Ti is now the fastest single GPU card on the block, even if it costs a few bucks more and I am sure NVIDIA will sit fine with that as will AMD fans who will embrace the lower price of the R90290X. Where the AMD R9 290X has a very low threshold for overclocking due to its high temperatures, the GTX 780 Ti has loads of headroom for tinkering and overclocking and that will grab the attention of the pure enthusiast who care not for who makes the card, just who’s card kicks the most ass, and for the moment that crown goes back to NVIDIA.  Well played “Green Team” the ball is now back in the AMD court to come up with a faster solution, which I personally always look forward to here at Tech Of Tomorrow. Have fun everyone and thanks for reading.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  • Wifekiler23

    I always loved Nvidia and this is why! man what GPU!!!
    One question what happened to the r9 290 giveway!

  • Interrogator

    #rekt

  • Νίκος Γκίρης

    is it worth to buy this card instead of r9 290x?

    • http://techrodd.webs.com/ Jento Pieters

      well, its less loud :D

      • Νίκος Γκίρης

        hahahah :P . sure ;) . but is going to release r9 290x non reference card…

        • Mike DeGeorge

          There are always non-reference cards, unless the company says no(like NVIDIA with their TITAN).

          • Νίκος Γκίρης

            i know. but my question is the same… is it worth to buy gtx 780ti? keep in mind of mantle

          • emsi93

            i have 290x and would never pay 150pounds more to get 780ti aint worth it!

            also it’s not loud ppl say that cause it’s better than nvidias so they hate….

          • GH0ST_SE7EN

            It’s loud. Really loud. And runs hotter, way hotter.

          • Aŋŏnyṁoṹs Ħaķĉeŗ

            40dbA, yeah, really loud!!!

          • Yaz Akiera

            Temps are very dependent on your case airflow, most of users have compact cases and the card will get too hot which in turn will be very loud. incase you have a full tower case with good airflow, i think it wont exceed 80 which will reduce the noise.

          • Mike DeGeorge

            Mantle isn’t necessarily going to be revolutionary.

    • Nick

      Well based on the ToT benchmarks, it depends on if you think the average fps gain of 6 frames is worth $150 extra

      • Elric Phares

        Good answer Mr, thanks.

  • DavidtheDuke

    Nvidia is obviously holding back at this point. They waited for the numbers on the 290x and released a card just a bit better than it. Very telling.

    • GH0ST_SE7EN

      You do realize there is nothing else to open on the GK110 right? What else can they be holding back? This is their last high end before Maxwell, except for possibly a 760 Ti or 770 Ti.

      • Yaz Akiera

        right, i guess we will see the Titan Ultra which will be based on Maxwell but not fully unlocked, then the same story goes again with the 880 Ti which will bring a fully unlocked Maxwell.

      • DavidtheDuke

        Okay, might be possible. Just seems odd how fast Nvidia reacted, then again, they probably know the details of their rivals card releases months in advance

        • GH0ST_SE7EN

          Its because the 780 Ti was supposed to be the 780, Titan (with less compute units) the 770, and the 780 the 760 Ti. The only reason they didn’t release it before was because they didn’t need to because AMD fumbled the ball with Tahiti. The 290x finally made them do it.

          • DavidtheDuke

            Cool, for competition’s sake I really hope so because like with Intel and AMD’s current competition, Intel basically is king and it has to hurt progress in the long run

  • WTF

    Here in Norway the cheapest R9 290x is priced at $685 whereas the 780Ti set you back $907 .. not an unsignificant difference.

    • Guest

      Lol wtf is up with Norway?

      • LaurentiuCristian

        In my country these cards are not available… :( maybe after official release 290x and 780ti will be priced… and after some days available..

    • Fukkireta_Pasteldechoclo

      here in chile the cheapest 290x cost $850 and the 780 (not ti) cost $900

      ._.

      • RaketeN

        in denmark the 290x is 708$ and the GTX780ti is 934$

        • Brajiru-kun

          Brazil:
          290x $950
          780Ti $1350
          We have them expensive shitz! Deal with it!

          • GH0ST_SE7EN

            That’s because of your import/export policy. Blame your politicians. Lol PS4 are $1850. THAT’S messed up.

          • Brajiru-kun

            Totally agree with you! ‘Muricans complain about their politicians being corrup and all, but you really doesn’t know how hard it is living here… and please don’t try to use “arguments” like: ‘go play soccer or sumthing’ (I’m not saying you would). Minimum wage is less then U$300, and I think an average monthly pay would be U$ 380… by the way, Wii U was just announced here, guess what?! U$ 833!! they are basicaly giving it away! [insert sad emoji here]

          • Alio

            Yeah, I sei about isso, cara.

          • Peou Richard Kovit

            due to exchange rate or including with taxes ?

    • Peou Richard Kovit

      I can understand that… quite far and its hard to get some stuff like pc stuff and etc ?

    • Izzy

      I feel your pain, Portugal is b*tch with prices too. They’re selling GTX 780Ti at $957,92 here. Q^Q’

  • Alio

    Oh, the competition…so beautiful…

  • Alex Lee

    What the heck is Luxmark and is that score alone significant for the 290X? Because that 290X Destroys all of those cards but in only that category and I’m curious?

  • Tomas Cabral

    Nice pics, detailed review. Keep up the good job guys!

  • Guest

    Elric, you should mention that the 780 Ti also has more room for overclocking (lower temps helps too) + the R9 290x is hard to get a good performance increase

    • Alio

      “Where the AMD R9 290X has a very low threshold for overclocking due to its high temperatures, the GTX 780 Ti has loads of headroom for tinkering and overclocking…”

  • Moinaldo

    Definitely 290x best bang for the buck hands down.

    • Yaz Akiera

      Nope, the R9 290 is the best bang for the buck, just for 400$ you get a card slower than the 290x by 3%-6% and its not loud and hot compared to the 290x.

      • Moinaldo

        Yes you are right. It’s just like the 7950 from last series.

  • Iuri Svera

    …It’s funny watching everyone talking about 780 (Ti) vs the 290x when AMD trolled everyone with a new release of just a R9-290 at $400 … more overclocking room … by far and well it beats the 290x … so woohooo

    • Elric Phares

      You think the 290 will beat the 290X? What planet are you on bro, the 290 is a lower speed card and slower than a 290X.

      • Iuri Svera

        Well I remember posting something and then it got removed I guess but oh hey .. here is some proof? LinusTech group got a nice overclock on the card so hey why not spend $400 on a R9-290 and get some water cooling while at it? 0.o

        • LotLP

          He himself claimed the 290x they got sent was a terrible overclocker, and they’ll be replacing it by one from asus with a custom cooler. (at least I think it’ll be a CC).

          Silicon fuckin’ lottery man.

          • Iuri Svera

            I know that… I watch the videos and read. But hey …If we’re talking money wise .. why not get 2x R9-280x for $400 …0.o

          • LotLP

            Because Crossfire (and by extension SLI) are absolutely terrible.

          • Iuri Svera

            Is there any proof of the R9-290 or R9-280x crossfire being anywhere bad? I know that they use different methods but hey … I think the PCI-e 3.0 x16 could handle the power not to mention it’s only recommended… PCI-e 2.0 is said to work just fine.

          • LotLP

            1: Not everyone is looking for the best bang for buck. I do not, and never will. I’m not building on a budget.
            2: I need the most power out of a SINGLE CARD WITH A SINGLE GPU.
            3: I have experience with SLI and Crossfire, and optimization/frametimes/microstutter seems to have not gotten significantly better over time for both manufacturers.

          • Iuri Svera

            Well there ya go. I’m simply stating a fact that he 290 can overclock more than the 290x .. But for you it seems like the 780 Ti would be a good buy.

          • Moinaldo

            It’s ok if you are not building on a budget, but for multi-gpu system on single 4k monitor, AMD has the lead. Hawaii GPUs scale almost a 100% per gpu and the microstutter did get significantly better on single monitor setup… but anyway, for a single gpu, 780ti got the crown, if one doesn’t care paying almost extra 30% to get roughly 5-10% extra performance

          • LotLP

            5-10% extra *before* overclocking. And from what I’ve seen, the 780TI is a better overclocker because the 290X is already pushed really far. if I was going to go for anything cost effective, I would not look at a 290X anyway.

            Also it’s going to be a fair while before 4K or 4K gaming is going to matter – by the time 4K IPS monitors are affordable, I’ll just upgrade to something else.

          • Moinaldo

            Hmm in the review, with both cards at stock settings, the 290x came ahead in one game, and the average between both cards (actual games not including firestike, heaven, luxmark), the 780ti is just 4% faster at 1080p… If we assume you can get 10% extra performance over stock when overclocking the 780ti, then it would be something like (1.04*1.10=1.144) the 780ti oc’d would be 14.4% faster than the stock 290x, so you would be paying 30% more money to get roughly 15% extra performance… It’d be interesting to get some reviews about overclocked non-reference models from both cards.

            I said 4k because I thought anyone going multi-gpu with these cards, was going to go high resolution, or maybe 1080p 144mhz. My point is that when going multigpu and using a single monitor, AMD scales a lot better now, with Hawaii scaling almost a 100% per gpu, and that is at any resolution.

        • Aŋŏnyṁoṹs Ħaķĉeŗ

          Dude, these are overclocked results, if you’re looking at stock benchmarks, the R9-290X is better than the R9-290.

          • Iuri Svera

            Did you even read what I said before the picture? All cards on that chart are overclocked … At least that’s what Linus said 0.o so there ya go … $400 with watercooling on top of it should make a decent build. =P

  • Okky Saputra

    so, this is the TITAN killer??

    • Pierre-Luc Meunier

      Technically the Titan stays best for sli than that gpu :) But for single gpu the 780ti is better.

    • Aŋŏnyṁoṹs Ħaķĉeŗ

      As shown in most of these benchmarks, the R9-290X is a titan killer itself.

      • Seth Hoke

        And this kills both lol, AMD can’t stay ahead of Nvidia in their current state lol. Sad. Least I got that price cut on my 780 though.

  • Iuri Svera

    Gotta say this 780 Ti has some firepower to it. Wonder what the benchmarks will look like for the 790. =P

  • John Kirby

    “TITAN” killer?

  • Grisou13

    can we do an SLI with a normale gtx 780?