140509_4people_728x90

Intel Unveils 72-Core x86 Knights Landing CPU for Exascale Supercomputing

By
Updated: November 27, 2013
Aubrey_Isle_die-640x480

It seems when computing does make a technological advancement, sometimes it’s a big step in the next evolution of the game. Knights Landing, which sounds like a daytime TV show name starring David Hasslehoff, is Intel’s next “ante up” in the game of technology so I know some will be disappointed ☺. The Knights Landing platform is based on Intel’s next generation Xeon Phi supercomputing chip that can contain up to 72 out-of-order cores. The biggest alteration to the design is that in lieu of a slot design that must be paired-up with a standard Xeon CPU, the new Knights Landing is a standalone processor that will easier to integrate and expand upon.

Intel’s Knights Landing tale is one of a CPU that will have up to 16GB of DRAM 3D stacked on-package, that will provide up to 500GB/sec of memory bandwidth (along with up to 384GB of DDR4-2400 mainboard memory). When Intel makes the move to the 14nm process then Knights Landing will make its debut and this should happen sometime sin 2015. With the promise of such power that Knights Landing is bring to the table and its 3 teraflops (double precision) per socket we will most assuredly see 100+ petaflop X86 supercomputers being introduced very soon. Companies like Aberdeen LLC will be on the forefront of this technology the same as they were with the first petabyte server.

KNL6-640x414

Currently the version of Xeon Phi (Knights Corner) and uses a PCIe expansion board with an up-to-61-core Intel MIC (Many Integrated Core) chips. These cores are based on the original P54C Pentium core and have many technological things in common with its stillborn Larrabee predecessor, although with many new additions that have come into play recently, such as 64-bit support and 512-bit vector registers. Knights’ Landing is essentially just a major revision of Knights Corner, but with mass changes across the entire platform. The original P54C cores have now been replaced with up to 72 out-of-order Silvermont (Atom) cores that will also implement AVX 3.1 instructions (AXX-512). Like stated earlier though the most ergonomic and important change is that now Knights Landing is a standalone CPU, with an integrated six-channel DDR4-2400 memory controller, up to 16GB of on-package 3D stacked RAM, and 36 PCIe 3.0 lanes.

KNL19-640x496

The theoretical performance of 6 teraflops of single precision math, or 3 teraflops of double precision math is what all the new changes equate to and if you compare Intel’s Haswell you will see that Haswell maxes out at around 500 gigaflops of double precision math. Currently the crop of efficient supercomputers in existence max out at around 4 gigaflops per-watt, but with Knight’s Landing we should see 14-16 gigaflops per-watt, which might not seem like a big deal, but with scaling it amounts to quite a bit. There will be 16GB of on-package RAM with a bandwidth of 500GB/sec; there should also be significant latency gains as well with this step up. By Q4 of 2015 we will see another version of this technology called Knights Landing-F that integrates a 100Gbps Cray HPC interconnect on 32 of those PCIe 3.0 lanes, allowing supercomputer makers to connect up Knights Landing chips via standard QSFP optical links. Knights Landing is the next step on Intel’s road map to Exascale computing.

KNL13-640x424

NVIDIA has their own solution called Tesla, which is their GPU-based coprocessor add-in board, and the Intel Xeon Phi is the direct competition to their market making stiff competitors for the men in green and black. NVIDIA currently has the “Lions Share” of the HPC/coprocessor market with 38 of the top 500 supercomputers using that technology. At the moment the Xeon Phi s a major component of the world’s most powerful supercomputer (Tianhe-2), but adoption is generally lower (just 13 of the top 500) by comparison. Making the move to becoming a standalone CPU rather than an ad-in card that must be controlled by a CPU (Haswell, Opteron, etc.), it will now be possible to build supercomputers entirely out of Xeon Phi that will reduce both the costs and the complexity of building supercomputers.

With Intel’s latest unified technology it will now be possible to write software that takes full advantage of Knights landings hardware and will make everything run smoother and faster. If we do the math At 3 teraflops per socket, assuming four sockets per 1U server, we’re looking at a full 500 teraflops (half a petaflop) in a single 42U rack. If the 100 petaflops barrier hasn’t been broken by 2015, it will almost certainly be a Knights Landing-based supercomputer that is the platform to do it. Intel is once again pushing the technology envelope and it will be interesting to say the least to see this new technology in action. Just think of the Knights Landing as the Chuck Norris of computer platforms ☺. Thanks for reading Tech of Tomorrow folks.

Source: Extreme Tech

  • Jose Valerio

    Will i be able to run BF4 with one of these :o

    • Hugo Petiz

      only medium with 30 fps

      • Fiberton

        If that is tongue and cheek about kaveri its over 60fps at 1280 x 720 which is interesting for 100 watt item.

    • Sure

      nope only solitaire

    • Sure

      WE ARE SICK FAX WE ARE SURE FAX

    • Alex Lee

      Not unless a single core in that CPU runs faster than 3.2Ghz

      • Fiberton

        Glad for mantle then.. Someone had a 8350 clocked down to 2ghz and the video card ran at max with no slow down. Interesting times ahead. The card was running on Mantle in BF4.

        • Plamen

          But that means there won’t be any difference between playing it with that “thing” or with a regular i5/i7…

        • Alex Lee

          That sounds incredible. I hope that something like that comes for NVIDIA, whether it’s DX12 or a new API.

          • Mohammed Alobaidan

            will AMD said NVIDIA can use Mantle

          • Alex Lee

            The problem akhi is that Mantle is relative to AMD’s specific GPU architecture so at first thought I don’t think it will ever work unless Nvidia adopts AMD’s chip architecture.

            Nvidia will have to make their own API, and why not?

          • Mohammed Alobaidan

            you are right but IMHO even if Nvidia will do something like mantle this will give make the game developers choose what API they will go with this will make more harm than good

          • Alex Lee

            Well who knows though. As far back as I can remember until very recently most PC games gave you the option of Direct3d or OpenGL in your graphics options so I’m not too sure just how complicated it really is.

            I know nothing about programming so maybe it’s a lot of work. I do know that for instance the new Xbox uses DirectX/D3d and PS4 uses OpenGL so developers already have to cater to both.

            I’m not arguing that you’re wrong though.

    • anotherone

      I run BF4 on my core i3 @2,93GHz and gtx 660 with 30/40 fps on ultra settings on 1680×1050!!

      • ivan-geqt

        bullshiet, I run it on FX 8320 clocked and a clocked GTX 760 barely at 30 fps on ultra settings on 1680×1050!!

        • Bryn Thomas

          resolutions arent everything!

          • liam thoams

            But they are an important number to look at

        • Sam

          Your processor is SHIT!

          • garrett

            dude i have a fx 6300 and 7950 and get ultra on 1680×1050. idk whats up with your setup

        • joe

          Get a better CPU. Seriously I dumped my 8150 and got the 4770K, the performance difference is massive. I didn’t think it would make a difference at all but I was really wrong.

          • dnre

            fx8150 was nuch buggier and because of that much slower CPU than fx8320. Anyway have look on your temps maybe something is overheating.

      • Nightmare106

        Not only will you be able to play BF4 with this baby, you won’t even need a GPU, lol.

        • Lonnie Monk

          You can’t run code designed to be run on modern gpu’s with this so it won’t play battlefield period, could replace your cpu though, thats the goal of intels design in this field since larrabee.

          • Nightmare106

            CPU is an universal processor that can do everything. But CPU isn’t good at graphics computing it. You’d need to add specific elements such as shader processors to make it run better but there’s no space on the die for that. So thats why GPU’s exist. So yeah, this is kind of true. But this thing will be able to run it. :)

    • Noah William Haysbert

      No. Im so sorry. If you already bought this, then you should return it. It doesn’t even have enough cores to render a video without lag and weirdness.

    • Nicolas Baron

      Nope. Those are atom cores.

  • Achaz Mowatt

    I bet you need liquid nitrogen just to cool this thing.

    • Jenne

      You need gold heating pipes to keep this kind of CPU at normal temperatures.

  • Alio

    Brace yourselves, DDR4 is on it’s way

  • LapX

    72 cores and only x86 ? WAAAAAAAAT ?

    • Valk

      Intel CPUs has always been x86 and most software run on x86 architecture. Is there a problem?

    • joe

      x86 platform yes, its what all CPU’s use. I think you’re getting confused between 64bit and 32bit. In the generalized term “x86″ it usually means both 64 and 32 bit.

  • The Jackal

    “Knights Landing, which sounds like a daytime TV show name starring David Hasslehoff,”

    Great call.

  • Yash

    Should have been Kings Landing. (If you know what i mean Game of Thrones fans)

  • alex7c5

    Is there the limit how much cores can there be? We might be getting to the limits, yes DDR4s

  • Mccodi

    Who needs 72 cores? Servers? #MerryChristmas

  • Jenish J

    I dont think you would send any products to my country, but you could give me BF4 game codes or any good videocard if you can ship.#MerryChirstmas anyway!! and happy Holidays everyone

  • Aaron Timmons

    WOW, Nice!!!!!!! Time to Upgrade my gaming computer!!!!!!
    Mary Christmas!!!

  • Nykell Wade

    #MerryChristmas Love tech of tommorrow! keep up the good work!

  • ViinceTech

    I want 72 cores!

    #merrychristmas

  • David Robles

    DAT processing power…hot damn, can’t wait to get mine

  • EGshytra khan

    i like my 4670k

  • Johann

    Merry Christmas!

  • dsgamez .

    Damn, that’s one hell of a leap.
    I’m not sure how more cores will actually affect gaming in a positive way, as programming for such CPU’s is going to be a bitch.
    I guess we’ll stop growing the amount of cores at some point and just up the clockrate. Or maybe even have multiple dedicated CPU’s, I don’t know.
    Boy, I love tech. xD

    • ThatWesleyguy

      This CPU isn’t meant for gaming -_- None of the Xeon line are. They are meant for professional/server usage.

      • dsgamez .

        I’m not saying it is.
        I’m just saying that the amount of cores keeps growing, even more gaming CPU’s.
        And even for server usage, programming is still a bitch, utilizing all the cores, etc.

  • Eric

    When will DDR4 arrive? I know the Maxwel CPUs will arrive in Q1 2014 and the’ll have a RAM controller for DDR4.

  • Gaurab

    #merrychristmas Merry christmas everybody.

  • Nirelko1 .

    #MerryChristmas WHATTT thats crazy

  • Michael Bradley

    #HappyHolidays everyone

  • juwon

    #MerryChrismas

  • nick wroten

    #merrychristmas nick w and thats 1 beefy processor when it comes out

  • Jutech1

    #MerrySINTERKLAAS – Jutech1

  • Enrique Maipeps

    Youtube: Enrique Maipeps
    Feliz navidad
    #merrychristmas 4 u too

  • USAROY .

    #MerryXmas

  • Austin Bennett

    #HappyChristmas

  • Jose Velez

    and what about the price :/ lol not for everyone

    • Vitalij Vasilevskij

      #Merrychristmas
      Why are you sad about it? Obviously it will cost aaaaalot, anyway I think that you don’t need it. Even 8 or 12 core is enough for super multitasking and other things.

  • jainendra

    #Merrychrismas

  • Manpreet Matharu

    #MerryChristmas ,Youtube:Manpreet Matharu

  • JM Janeros

    72 core ??? well …
    #MERRYFREAKINCHRISTMAS !!!

  • David Mclean

    #Happy_Holidays Everyone.

  • Sh00terMcGee

    #christmas tech time!!

  • Nasir Shaik

    #MerryChristmas
    TheHolyEvade

    But will it load Internet Explorer?